A FORWARD-LOOKING MACROECONOMIC SCALAR FOR IFRS 9 PD IN DEVELOPING ECONOMIES

Authors

  • Israel Odion E. Idewele (Ph.D) Department of Banking and Finance Evangel University. Ebonyi State, Nigeria
  • Associate Professor Dibua, Ekene C. Department of Accountancy, Paul’s University, Awka, Anambra State.
  • Ikilidih, Joy N. (Ph.D) Department of Accountancy, Paul’s University, Awka, Anambra State.

Keywords:

projected credit loss, IFRS 9, probability of default, macroeconomic, and forward-looking The accounting of financial assets and liabilities is governed by IFRS 9

Abstract

With the introduction of an anticipated credit loss (ECL) framework to account for impairments, IFRS 9 regulates the reporting of financial assets and liabilities. At every reporting date, the ECL model updates recognized ECLs by taking into account historical data, present circumstances, and anticipated information. Usually, ECL is divided into three parts: exposure at default (EAD), loss given default (LGD), and probability of default (PD). In order to improve accuracy, this research suggests a way for creating a macroeconomic scalar to modify PD in the ECL model by including forward-looking data. Datasets from Cameroon and Nigeria are utilized to demonstrate the suggested methodology, and different modeling approaches are employed for validation. Five steps make up the methodology: (1) planning and research, (2) data preparation, (3) model construction, (4) macroeconomic scalar computation, and (5) model validation. Regression, feed forward neural networks, random forest, gradient boosting, and GLM (Logit, Probit) are some of the methods used. For the Nigerian and Cameroonian datasets, the macroeconomic scalar that was constructed successfully adjusted PD within the ECL model. Every modeling strategy offered insightful information, proving the scalar's capacity to enhance ECL forecasts. A reliable technique for adding forward-looking data to the ECL model is to incorporate a macroeconomic scalar. This improves PD accuracy and can take into account the uncertainty, volatility, and sparse data that are characteristics of developing countries.In this study, a scalable method for modifying PD in ECL models with macroeconomic data is presented, with a focus on developing nations.

Author Biography

Ikilidih, Joy N. (Ph.D) , Department of Accountancy, Paul’s University, Awka, Anambra State.

X

References

Bellini, T., 2019. IFRS 9 and CECL Credit Risk Modelling and Validation: A Practical Guide with Examples Worked in R and SAS. 1st ed. London: Elsevier.

Bellotti, T. & Crook, J., 2013. Forecasting and stress testing credit card default using dynamic models. International Journal of Forecasting, Volume 29, pp. 563-574.

Black, B., 2016. Probability-Weighted Outcomes Under A Macroeconomic Approach. [Online]

Available at: https://www.moodysanalytics.com/webinars-on-demand/2016/probablility-weighted-outcomes-macroeconomic-approach

Breed, D. G. et al., 2021. Development of an Impairment Point in Time Probability of Default Model for Revolving Retail Credit Products: South African Case Study. Risks, 9(208).

Breed, D. et al., 2023. A Forward-Looking IFRS 9 Methodology, Focussing on the Incorporation of Macroeconomic and Macroprudential Information into Expected Credit Loss Calculation. Risks, 11(59).

Cleveland, W. S., 1979. Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(368), pp. 829-836.

Crook, J. & Bellotti, T., 2010. Time-varying and dynamic models for default risk in consumer loans. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 173(2), pp. 283-305.

Durović, A., 2019. Macroeconomic Approach to Point in Time Probability of Default Modeling – IFRS 9 Challenges. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Volume 1, pp. 209-223.

Engelman, B. & Rauhmeier, R., 2011. The Basel II Risk Parameters: Estimation, Validation, and Stress Testing (second edition). 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.

Fuller, W. A., 1996. Introduction to statistical time series. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Hawkes, H., 2021. GDP alternatives: 8 ways of measuring economic health. [Online]

Available at: https://intheblack.cpaaustralia.com.au/economy/8-ways-of-measuring-economic-health

IFRS, 2014. IRFS9 Financial Instruments: Project Summary. [Online]

Available at: http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Financial-Instruments-A-Replacement-of-IAS-39-Financial-Instruments-Recognitio/Documents/IFRS-9-Project-Summary-July-2014.pdf[Accessed 31 January 2016].

Jacobs, M., 2019. An Analysis of the Impact of Modeling Assumptions in the Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) Framework on the Provisioning for Credit Loss. Journal of Risk & Control, 6(1), pp. 65-112.

James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R., 2013. An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. New York: Springer.

Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J. & Li, W., 2005. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Lin, F. J., 2008. Solving multicollinearity in the process of fitting regression model using the nested estimate procedure. Quality and Quantity, 42(3), pp. 417-426.

PWC, 2017. In-depth IFRS 9 impairment: How to include multiple forward-looking scenarios, London: PWC.

SAS Institute Inc, 2020. Machine Learning Using SAS® Viya® Course Notes (LWCPML35/CPML35). NC: SAS.

SAS Institute, 2010. Predictive Modelling Using Logistic Regression. NC: SAS Institute Inc.

Schutte, W. D. et al., 2020. A proposed benchmark model using a modularised approach to calculate IFRS9 expected credit loss. Accepted in Cogent Economics & Finance. Cogent Economics & Finance.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17 — Updated on 2026-02-17