EFFECTS OF PARTICIPATORY BUDGET PRACTICE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL COMMUNITIES OF EBONYI STATE: FOCUS ON DEVELOPMENT CENTERS OF EBONYI STATE
Keywords:
Effects – Participatory – Budget – Economic Development – Rural – CommunitiesAbstract
The study examined the effects of Participatory Budget Practices on Economic Development in the rural communities of Ebonyi State: Focus on the Development Centers of Ebonyi State. Four research questions guided the study. The design was a descriptive survey while the population of the study is made up of 167 Development Centers key Players (DCKPs) and 300 Rural Communities Stakeholders (RCS) as explained in the methodology of this study. Instrument for data collection was self structured questionnaire which was distributed through the help of three staff of the Development Centers, one from each Senatorial Zone. The instrument was validated by two experts from Faculty of Management Science of Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki. Cronbache’s alpha was used to correlate the 50 copies of the instruments distributed on two weeks interval to staffers of Local Government service Commission and Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Matters of Ebonyi State. It yielded alpha of 0.83 correlation co-efficient. The data collected from the four questionnaires were analyzed using mean and Standard Deviation, while t-test of difference was used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The findings of the study revealed among other things that arranging for public hearing and meetings for citizens to make input, creating avenues for rural dwellers platform for feedback during budget implementation; community outreach/mobilization and appointing community representatives in budget committee could lead to improve in the provision of portable water to the rural dwellers in Ebonyi State. The study recommended that Local Government should always engage the citizens in the budgetary process to allow them present their most pressing needs such as provision of portable water to the rural dwellers; Local Government should enforce transparency approaches in the process of budgeting to enable the citizens to effectively participate on the process. This could help the stakeholders of the communities. The findings of this study has shown that participatory budget could improved economic development at the rural communities of Ebonyi State to high extent visa-viz provision of portable water to the rural dwellers, quality education, improved electricity supply and employment opportunities to the rural communities of Ebonyi state. These have definite implications on the local government, the rural dwellers and the policy makers. It then means that if the stakeholders of the rural communities are given opportunities to participate in planning the development of their areas they could present the major challenges facing them to be included in the budget.References
Abah, E. O. & Nwokwu, P. M. (2016). Work place motivation and employees productivity
in the Nigerian public organisations: The Federal Radio Corporation of Nigeria
(FRCN) experience. Journal of Resource Development and Management.
An International Peer-Review Journal, 12, 30- 43.
Ajibola, R. (2012). Public finance: principle and practice. Lagos: AVL Publishing.
Cabannes, Y., & Lipietz, B. (2015). The democratic contribution of participatory
budgeting. LSE International Development Working Paper Series 15–168.
London School of Economics and Political Science.
Cabannes, Y., & Lipietz, B. (2018). Revisiting the democratic promise of participatory budgeting in
light of competing political, good governance and technocratic logics. Environment and
Urbanization, 30(1), 67–84.
Dias, N., & Júlio, S. (2018). The next thirty years of participatory budgeting in the world
start today. In N. Dias (Ed.), Hope for democracy (pp. 15–32). Epopeia Records-
Oficina.
Ezeani, E. O. (2006). Fundamental of Public Administration. Enugu: Zik–Chuks Publishers.
Gilman, H., & Lucero, L. (2023). Participatory budgeting is about to blow up
across the country. Fulcrum. Retrieved July 30, 2024, from
https://thefulcrum.us/participatory-budgeting
Ganuza, E., & Baiocchi, G. (2019). The long journey of participatory budgeting. In S. Elstub, & O.
Escobar (Eds.), Handbook of democratic innovation and governance (pp. 77–89). Edward
Elgar Publishing.
Gilman, H., & Lucero, L. (2023, February 15). Participatory budgeting is about to blow up across the
country.Fulcrum. Retrieved July 30, 2024, from https://thefulcrum.us/participatory-budgeting
Lerner, J. (2024). From waves to ecosystems: the next stage of democratic innovation. SNF Ithaca
Initiative: University of Delaware.
Marujo, H. (2021). Enhancing a culture of peace: The prominence of local community engagements
and the role of Public hearings on quality of life. Local Development and Society, 2(2),
187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/26883597.2021.1960184
Milosavljević, M., Spasenić, Ž., & Krivokapić, J. (2023). Bibliometric review of participatory
budgeting: Current status and future research agenda. International Journal Financial
Studies, 11(3), 1–14.
Nwigboji, V. N. & Onwe, S. O. (2022). Effects of Local Government Budgeting on the Economic
Development in the Local Government of Ebonyi State, Nigeria. IAA Journal of Social
Science 8(1):94-102.
Okpata, F.O. (2004). Public administration: Theory and practice. Enugu: Cheston Agency Ltd.
Schugurensky, D. (2013). Volunteers for democracy: Informal learning through participatory
budgeting. In F. Duguid, K. Mundel, & D. Schugurensky (Eds.), Informal learning, volunteer
work and social action (pp. 159–176). Sense Publishers.
Schugurensky, D. & Mook, L. (2024). Participatory Budgeting and Local Government Development:
Impact, Challenges, and Prospect. Local Government Development Society 5(3), 433-445.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL ACCOUNTING

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.